German farmers reap benefits of harvesting renewable energy

Dirk Ketelsen is a farmer but these days most of his income comes from harvesting the wind. On Germany’s North Sea coast, where a fierce sea breeze blasts in across the polders, the generous financial support the government has poured into renewable energy has reared a crop of wind turbines as far as the eye can see.

 

Such policies have unleashed a boom for wind, sun and other sources of renewable energy, which now account for 23 per cent of the electricity consumption of Europe’s biggest economy.

They have also proved highly lucrative for farmers like Mr. Ketelsen. The tariffs set by the Renewable Energy Act, known as the EEG, not only give renewables priority access to the electricity grid – ahead of the electricity produced by traditional power plants – they ensure their owners a guaranteed return over 20 years.

“Before the EEG, we said we’ll do this for ecological reasons. Even if there’s just a little bit of profit. Then came the EEG, and it worked out very well financially,” Mr Ketelsen said.

Whether that continues remains to be seen. A growing chorus of critics complain that an earnest attempt to nurture green energy has spun out of control, creating a welfare system for farmers and landowners while saddling Germany with some of the highest household electricity bills in Europe.

Utilities, which have been forced to mothball gas-powered plants because they are no longer profitable, are also crying foul. “We are feeding a giant with baby nutrition, missing the point that this giant can and needs to walk on its own feet now,” Johannes Teyssen, the head of Eon, Germany’s largest utility, told the Financial Times recently.

Amid the outcry, Germany’s new coalition government has announced plans to rein in the subsidies. But doing so will put them on a collision course with citizens in places like Reussenköge, where renewables have transformed a way of life.

The 120 households in the village are supported by 70 wind turbines in a communally owned park. The return on the villagers’ investment depends on their share of ownership.

 One of Mr. Ketelsen’s neighbours, Johannes Rabe, said: “Let’s put it this way, a large part of the community is now in the top income tax bracket – and more than half of their income is from renewable energy.”

Farming, by contrast, employs ever-fewer people, Mr. Rabe said. “Seventy years ago, each farmer around here would have eight people to help him. Now, just one in four of the farmers is still in business, and they work alone.”

The trappings of success are evident. Mr. Ketelsen’s imposing farmhouse sports a four-wheel-drive with his company’s Dirkshof logo parked outside. The farm still grows carrots and peas for a well-known brand of organic baby food, but 95 per cent of his income now comes from renewable energy.

He sold off his cows and sheep to concentrate on running a consultancy advising on the development of wind farms across Germany. The barns where his cattle were once stalled have been converted to offices for the consultancy’s 14 employees, while the corn granary in the farmhouse’s spacious attic is now a meeting room.

We are feeding a giant with baby nutrition, missing the point that this giant can and needs to walk on its own feet now

– Johannes Teyssen, head of Eon, Germany’s largest utility

The benefits of the EEG, including the guaranteed price paid to renewables operators, are funded through a surcharge to household energy bills that are among the highest in Europe. The annual cost of supporting the so-called “feed-in” tariffs across Germany is set to rise to €23.6bn next year.

Schleswig-Holstein, the federal state that includes Reussenköge, is one of the biggest EEG beneficiaries. The state received €1.5bn in renewable energy compensation in 2012. After payments by its consumers and businesses are deducted, it still made a net gain of €400m.

It has even bigger ambitions: by the end of this decade, the state aims to produce up to four times as much renewable energy as it consumes. The plan is to export the excess to other states and Scandinavia – although new transmission lines will first need to be built.

Critics of Germany’s renewable policies say that the big winnings for Schleswig-Holstein’s landowners come at the expense of the country’s poorest citizens, who lose a bigger slice of their income to high power bills.

“In terms of political economy, it’s brilliant: Greens who live in the city and worry about the environment tend to be wealthier and willing to pay,” says Mark Hallerberg, professor of public management and political science at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin. “Then there are the conservative Bavarian farmers – if you drive around the south of Germany, it seems like every other farm has solar panels on its roof. Then in Schleswig-Holstein all these farmers have wind farms. Usually farmers and Greens aren’t on the same side.”

He added. “From an economic perspective I think this is terrible.”

Germany’s freshly unveiled coalition agreementproposes sweeping reforms by next summer, with the aim of reducing costs. This includes a scaling back of feed-in tariffs and a review of the special exemptions that shield heavy industry from their full cost.

Mr. Ketelsen and the farmers of Reussenköge are already on guard. Last weekend, they joined renewable energy producers and environmentalists from across the country in a protest at the chancellery in Berlin.

The event was billed as a ‘rescue’ of Germany’s switch to renewable energy, known as the Energiewende. “In our view, the Energiewende is not to be stopped,” Mr. Ketelsen said. “And if any politicians think otherwise we will brief them, and demonstrate.”

This article is from the Financial Times. It is reprinted here as the ft will not allow a link to any article with out a subscription!

 This is how to get a renewable energy future built today!

This is why the German economy does so well even when there is a recession. This is why 25% of all electricity in Germany is produced by renewable technology. David Cameron needs to stop being a shill for the big 6 energy companies and start helping the UK create a renewable future for the people.

The German people get out and protest when they don’t like government policy. They do it often and the government listens.

Get on the train Cameron!

We have the knowledge and the technology in place today to build a renewable energy system to power this country. Not 7% of the country but the all of the country! So let’s get the government on board the train to clean energy, the real clean energy, renewable energy!

Tear Down That ECO Building!

What happens in a conservative led government to green building projects?

1. They don’t get built?

2. Funding is removed?

3. Award winning green structures get torn down?

The Answer? 3. Award winning green buildings get torn down!

I am in shock over the article I found about a Sainsbury’s getting torn down:

Sainsbury’s announced last year that it would be leaving the store in favour of a new larger supermarket nearby designed by Unit Architects.

It has now emerged that the old store, which won several green awards, is set to be demolished to make way for an IKEA outlet.

Writing in BD, Hinkin said the decision made him “mad as hell” and questioned the sustainability of knocking down a building after just 14 years.

Sainsbury’s is understood to have sold the site on the basis that it cannot be let to another food retailer, reducing the likelihood of finding another tenant.

Building performance consultant Doug King was lead engineer on the project. He said the decision to knock it down “defies belief” and is a “tremendous shame”.

“IKEA has described this as a sustainable development but it involves knocking down a building built to minimise the impact of retail operations,” he said. “These property owners make headline claims about sustainability but this demonstrates that they really don’t get what sustainability is. This really exposes the ‘emperor’s clothes’ of the sustainable property sector.”

Campaign launched to save Eco supermarket – The Green Building Press

http://www.greenbuildingpress.co.uk/images/articles/large/Greenwich-Sainsbury-ready.jpg

 

One of the most ignorant things about Cameron

David Cameron believes that nuclear energy is clean. This is one of the most ignorant things about our leader. He wants to have new nuclear plants build at Hinkley. He wants the French to build them but they won’t pay for it. The Chinese are willing to pay for the building cost of 16 billion pounds. This will mean the UK energy bill payer will be saddled with higher bill for 35 years into the future. How many warehouse and factory roofs could we put solar energy systems on for 16 Billion pounds? How many energy storage systems could we build with this amount of money. This government and the last have spent a stupidly small fraction of 16 Billion pounds on renewable energy. Spending that kid of money on a distributed system of renewable energy production would be cleaner, greener, and cheaper for us all.

Do you think Nuclear energy is clean?

Think again – The guardian

Cameron Caves into pressure

The need for a change in policy over the big 6 energy companies profits is necessary. David Cameron has buckled under the pressure applied by the big 6. He wants to roll back the targets set under the Energy Companies Obligation (ECO). This will mean the UK will not be able to meet the targets set for carbon reduction. Cameron also wants to move the ECO levy on the big 6 to general taxation. This means that all the UK taxpayers will pay for these measures at a time when the big 6 are making record profits.

The purpose of ECO  is to help those living at or below the poverty line to reduce their carbon emissions and lower their bills. There are 2.7 million families with old inefficient heating systems that need help from the government to increase efficiency and save money. The changes being planed by our PM will change who pays from the profiteering big 6 to you the taxpayer.

Labour’s Shadow Minister for Energy and Climate Change has this to say:

“Even after these changes to levies, energy bills are still rising and the average household will still be paying £70 more for their energy than last winter,” said Labour’s Shadow Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Caroline Flint. “Any help is better than none, but you can judge this Government by who they’re asking to pick up the tab – the taxpayer. The energy companies have got off scot-free.

“This shows why nothing less than a price freeze and action to reset the market to stop the energy companies overcharging again in the future will do.”

You can read more of Ms Flint’s quotes here – ITV News

America has right idea, can UK get back on track?

We have already looked at Germany’s giant contribution to renewable energy. Let’s look at what the USA is doing. Remember that the US government has not signed up to the Kyoto protocol. They have no requirement to lower carbon output or reach any set level for renewable energy.

While our solar industry is floundering under cuts  in funding from our ‘greenest Ever Government,’ in the USA an article states that: Between April and June, the US installed 832MW, or enough energy to power all the homes in Austin, Texas, representing a 15% increase compared to the beginning of this year. It was solar’s second best quarter ever.

The RTCC article continues:
US Solar Energy Industry Association president and CEO Rhone Resch said:
“We’re helping to create new jobs, grow the US economy, strengthen our nation’s long-term energy security and fight climate change. That’s a win-win in anyone’s book.”

Cameron’s fracking push ignores UK’s binding climate targets

Fracking can damage our ground water tables. Fracking can lead to surface pollution of the chemical byproducts. Fracking causes earthquakes.
More importantly, tax subsidies given to the companies who want to frack is turning our back on the renewable energy future we all want and need.

Read more at: Responding To Climate Change

“The Greenest Government Ever” is a total lie.

Why is our government wasting time? Why is this current coalition cutting funding to renewable clean energy? We have seen interest in solar drop until it is critically hampered. Could it be an accident that the history of UK funding for renewable energy has started then stopped time after time? Is it some unique properties of the UK energy system that makes connecting to the grid difficult, costly to consumers and hinders the progress of renewable energy? Is it an accident of fortune that this government decided to radically cut the funding for the Feed In Tariff? Is it a cruel twist of fate that David Cameron went to France just after the FIT cuts were finally in place to sign a deal with the French to build a new nuclear power plant? I don’t think so! I think the “The Greenest Government Ever” is a total lie.

Only 2% believe David Cameron is leading ‘greenest government ever’

Russel And His Messiah Complex

I Saw Russell Brand’s Messiah Complex show tonight. It was reverent, hilarious, controversial, and covered many of the subjects I will be discussing in other books in The Alphabet Revolution series.
I gave him a note which asked him for an interview for my book. I hope that he will call me or visit the blog. I think that we may have a lot in common when it comes to starting a peaceful revolution.
Here is his Messiah Complex

We Have Renewable Technology Now – Why Not Use It?

As a country we are ready to embrace the renewable future we need today. All the technology and systems are available now. The people want to see more renewable energy, without having to pay over the odds to get it. The government has done studies that show clearly that not employing the renewable energy measures now will cost us all dearly in the future. We will suffer many woes from a broken climate to the increasing difficulties of feeding our population. We may even run out of the very power we need to heat and light our homes. If we have all the necessary tools what, is stopping us from dealing with the crisis?

An article proving the point!

“Inverness South councilor is barred by the local authority from taking part in determining wind farm planning applications because of his negative views.”